ELOG GENETIS

Updates and Results Talks and Posters Advice Ideas Important Figures Write-Ups Outreach How-To Funding Opportunities GENETIS

GENETIS

Fields marked with * are required
Entry time:	Fri Jul 8 13:35:19 2022
Author*:
Subject*:
<p dir="ltr">The second-best individual in this evolution was Bicone 22 from generation 40. This individual is, in fact, a fascinating case as we shall see. But to start the story of this individual we will go back to generation 38 in order to demonstrate some of the peculiarities. </p> <p> </p> <p dir="ltr">In generation 38 there were two bicones of no renown,  Bicone 11 and Bicone 17. Bicone 11 was a fairly average individual that was ranked 23rd with a fitness score of 4.72016. Its DNA was {<span style="color:#0000FF">6.16084</span>, <span style="color:#800080">79.663</span>, <span style="color:#0000FF">0.0015434</span>, <span style="color:#0000FF">-0.107765</span>} for side one , and {<span style="color:#800080">0.308809</span>, <span style="color:#800080">39.6742</span>, <span style="color:#800080">-0.0084247</span>, <span style="color:#800080">0.40629</span>} for side two. One day, by chance it met Bicone 17, another average bicone ranked 24th with a score of 4.71877 and DNA {<span style="color:#FF0000">2.32499</span>, <span style="color:#800080">79.663</span>, <span style="color:#FF0000">-0.00224948</span>, <span style="color:#FF0000">0.192602</span>} for side one, and {<span style="color:#800080">0.308809</span>, <span style="color:#800080">39.6742</span>, <span style="color:#800080">-0.0084247</span>, <span style="color:#800080">0.40629</span>} for side two. These two individuals eventually became the parents of two antennas: Bicone 16 and Bicone 17 of generation 39.</p> <p> </p> <p dir="ltr">Bicone 16 eventually grew to have been ranked 3rd in fitness score of 4.95323. It’s DNA ended up being a complete balance of its parents sharing side one with Bicone 38.11{<span style="color:#FF0000">2.32499</span>, <span style="color:#800080">79.663</span>, <span style="color:#FF0000">-0.00224948</span>, <span style="color:#FF0000">0.192602</span>} and side two with bicone 38.17 {<span style="color:#800080">0.308809</span>, <span style="color:#800080">39.6742</span>, <span style="color:#800080">-0.0084247</span>, <span style="color:#800080">0.40629</span>}. Bicone 16 was an individual with high aspirations and hoped to be reproduced. But alas, it was not meant to be. But bicone 16 came upon some amazing luck, it was selected with itself for crossover. This meant that bicone 16 was able to provide two identical surrogates to survive into the next generation. This is where this Bicone fulfilled its full potential. </p> <p> </p> <p dir="ltr">The twin bicones were named Bicone 22 and Bicone 23 in generation 40. Being clones, they shared all their DNA with Bicone 39.16. However, due to some circumstances, they had slightly different fitness scores. Bicone 23 managed a very respectable 5.0117 fitness score and was ranked 2nd in the generation. But not to be outdone Bicone 22 managed to score a 5.17014 and ended up being the second-best performing individual of all time. Being so successful, the two bicones ended up producing 8 children between the two groups.</p> <p> </p> <p dir="ltr">Bicone 23 was the first to crossover and had 2 children with its partner Bicone 25 (4.64409). These were Bicones 4 and 5. Bicone 4 was ranked 39th with a fitness score of 4.60251 and still shared the DNA of its second side with its grandparent Bicone 38.17 as well as most of its first side with Bicone 38.11 {<span style="color:#FF0000">2.32499</span>, <span style="color:#800080">79.663</span>, -0.00213879, <span style="color:#FF0000">0.192602</span>} {<span style="color:#800080">0.308809</span>, 39.9608, <span style="color:#800080">-0.0084247</span>, <span style="color:#800080">0.40629</span>}. Bicone 5 on the other hand, was ranked 14th with a fitness score of 4.80535 and it still shared a lot of DNA with its grandparents {<span style="color:#0000FF">6.16084</span>,53.0851,<span style="color:#FF0000">-0.00224948</span>,0.0534469} {0.966617,<span style="color:#800080">39.6742</span>,<span style="color:#800080">-0.0084247</span>,<span style="color:#800080">0.40629</span>}.</p> <p> </p> <p dir="ltr">Bicone 22 had 6 children of its own with various other Bicones. These were; With Bicone 8.40 (4.82423) Bicone 8, ranked 11th with a fitness Score of 4.81784 and DNA {<span style="color:#FF0000">2.32499</span>, 75.9855, <span style="color:#FF0000">-0.00224948</span>, <span style="color:#FF0000">0.192602</span>} {0.966617, <span style="color:#800080">39.6742</span>, -0.00320023, 0.213833}; Bicone 9, ranked 7th with a fitness score of 4.88966 and DNA {6.10508, <span style="color:#800080">79.663</span>, -0.000594616, 0.0351901} {<span style="color:#800080">0.308809</span>, 42.4246, <span style="color:#800080">-0.0084247</span>, <span style="color:#800080">0.40629</span>}; With Biocone 16.40 (5.01137) Bicone 12, ranked 12th with a fitness score of 4.81705 and DNA {6.42695, 75.9855, <span style="color:#0000FF">0.0015434</span>, <span style="color:#0000FF">-0.107765</span>} {<span style="color:#800080">0.308809</span>, <span style="color:#800080">39.6742</span>, -0.00320023, 0.213833}; Bicone 13, ranked 2nd with a fitness score of 5.0344 and DNA {<span style="color:#FF0000">2.32499</span>, <span style="color:#800080">79.663</span>, <span style="color:#FF0000">-0.00224948</span>, <span style="color:#FF0000">0.192602</span>} {0.966617, 42.4246, <span style="color:#800080">-0.0084247</span>, <span style="color:#800080">0.40629</span>}; With Bicone 4.40 (4.66578) Bicone 34 ranked 3rd with a fitness score of 4.99864 and DNA {0.66148, 73.5522, -0.000594616, 0.00582814} {0.966617, <span style="color:#800080">39.6742</span>, <span style="color:#800080">-0.0084247,</span> <span style="color:#800080">0.40629</span>}; and finally Bicone 35, ranked 22nd with fitness score 4.74955 and DNA {<span style="color:#FF0000">2.32499</span>, <span style="color:#800080">79.663</span>, <span style="color:#FF0000">-0.00224948</span>, <span style="color:#FF0000">0.192602</span>} {<span style="color:#800080">0.308809</span>, 42.4246, <span style="color:#800080">-0.0084247</span>, <span style="color:#800080">0.40629</span>}</p> <p dir="ltr"> </p> <p dir="ltr">Upon inspection of the children in generation 41, you will see that none of the children surpassed their parent individual with the highest fitness score. They do however tend to have fitness scores around or above their second parent's score. Therefore, it is likely that the children's lower fitness score is due to a mismatch of genes. If we look at the rainbow plots provided, we can see that the genes of the worst-performing child are not dissimilar to those of individuals that scored higher than 5. This would imply that the fitness score found could be due to variations in Arasim similar to those seen from individuals 16.39 to 22/23.40 despite them being identical. Though it also could be possible that the graphs do not have a fine enough display to be able to clearly tell some of the genes apart. </p> <p dir="ltr"><span style="color:#0000FF">Gene originating from Bicone 38.11</span></p> <p dir="ltr"><span style="color:#FF0000">Gene originating from Bicone 38.17</span></p> <p dir="ltr"><span style="color:#800080">Gene originating from Bicone 38.11 and 38.17 that is shared between the two.</span></p> <p dir="ltr">Amy: We want to nail things down in places where we still have hypotheses for what could have happened.  For example, "This would imply that the fitness score found could be due to variations in Arasim similar to those seen from individuals 16.39 to 22/23.40 despite them being identical. Though it also could be possible that the graphs do not have a fine enough display to be able to clearly tell some of the genes apart."  These two hypotheses can easily be distinguished by running with higher statistics and looking at the numbers rather than relying on the resolution of the display.</p> <p dir="ltr">Amy: Also, at each stage, I was looking for the random numbers that were generated that led to the selection of the fractions of the population that were used for each type of selection and operator.  </p> <p dir="ltr"> </p> <div> </div> <div> </div> Encoding**: HTML ELCode plain Suppress Email notification Resubmit as new entry

Attachment 1:	Rainbow_Plot_Quadratic_Rank_Test_5.png
Attachment 2:	Rainbow_Plot_Quadratic_Rank_Test_4.5.png
Attachment 3:	Rainbow_Plot_Quadratic_Rank_Test_4.png
Attachment 4:	Rainbow_Plot_Quadratic_Rank_Test_3.5.png
Attachment 5:
Drop attachments here...

ELOG V3.1.5-fc6679b