Updates and Results Talks and Posters Advice Ideas Important Figures Write-Ups Outreach How-To Funding Opportunities GENETIS
  GENETIS  ELOG logo
 List  |  New  |  Edit  |  Delete  |  Reply  |  Duplicate  |  Find  |  Config  |  Help 
Message ID: 65     Entry time: Tue Jun 9 15:00:09 2020
Author: Alex Machtay 
Subject: Daily Update 6/9/20 
Name Today's Update Plams for Tomorrow
Alex M

Alex P and I kept working on finding differences in AraSim between antennas. We still haven't found any and we've checked: electric field, maximum peak voltage, effective height, threshold (factor and offset), and the fft (and maybe more I'm forgetting). I'm not sure where to go from here in investigating AraSim. 

I tried running the loop with a smaller grid size to see if we could get some more comparisons, but I ran into errors that I need to resolve.

Julie and I resolved some comments on the paper.

  
Alex P Went through more of AraSim after more of Amy's comments. Found V_forfft and they were the same between individuals and then looked for other information to compare but what is interesting is that with the smaller grid spacing on the smaller antennas we have two generations with the exact same dimensions and the smaller grid spacing had lower vEff across the board, such as the larger grid spacing on small antennas had 4 individuals with a vEffective above 5 but the small grid spacing didn't have any that got above 5. So it is possible that the zero vEffective for the small antennas wasn't an error but that the larger fitness scores were the error. 
Plan is to continue to look into how grid spacing affects the vEffectives especially of smaller antennas and also make sure the grid spacing we were using for the larger antenna is appropriate and then look into the automatic grid spacing whether we can do it within XF or by having it automatically update the Xmacro based off the lengths
Eliot    
Leo    
Evelyn    
Ryan    

 

ELOG V3.1.5-fc6679b